<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for TBLI BLOG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tbli.org/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tbli.org</link>
	<description>The world will benefit when the economy supports well-being.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 12:41:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I don&#8217;t remember by David</title>
		<link>http://blog.tbli.org/?p=295&#038;cpage=1#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 12:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tbli.org/?p=295#comment-493</guid>
		<description>Institutionalized theft is a huge problem especially in the anglo-saxon world.  If GS proves to be &#039;not guilty&#039; as their horrible conduct is not illegal by law, then lawmakers themselves are guilty. Liberalization of the banking sector was btw largely carried out under president Clinton, masterbrained by mr Rubin (ex GS), his Treasury secretary. And now the GOP swears to block all financial reform. 
That should tell us enough. Time for a third choice in the US!

David

PS: 13 of the 85 billion of public money that was used to save AIG (policy created by finance Minister Paulson - also ex GS) was directly forwarded to GS, as their risky subprime portfolio had been insured there. In classic Fox news style: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3AlFe8l4OE - surreal to see them attack rich people for a change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Institutionalized theft is a huge problem especially in the anglo-saxon world.  If GS proves to be &#8216;not guilty&#8217; as their horrible conduct is not illegal by law, then lawmakers themselves are guilty. Liberalization of the banking sector was btw largely carried out under president Clinton, masterbrained by mr Rubin (ex GS), his Treasury secretary. And now the GOP swears to block all financial reform.<br />
That should tell us enough. Time for a third choice in the US!</p>
<p>David</p>
<p>PS: 13 of the 85 billion of public money that was used to save AIG (policy created by finance Minister Paulson &#8211; also ex GS) was directly forwarded to GS, as their risky subprime portfolio had been insured there. In classic Fox news style: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3AlFe8l4OE" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3AlFe8l4OE</a> &#8211; surreal to see them attack rich people for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I don&#8217;t remember by Hans van Bennekom</title>
		<link>http://blog.tbli.org/?p=295&#038;cpage=1#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans van Bennekom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 21:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tbli.org/?p=295#comment-492</guid>
		<description>&quot;unreal to watch&quot; - spot on!

Mr Blankfein&#039;s earlier claim he plays &#039;the role of God&#039; already was prove of the banks disdain.
On top of that he showed no dignity whatsoever during  Levin&#039;s interrogation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;unreal to watch&#8221; &#8211; spot on!</p>
<p>Mr Blankfein&#8217;s earlier claim he plays &#8216;the role of God&#8217; already was prove of the banks disdain.<br />
On top of that he showed no dignity whatsoever during  Levin&#8217;s interrogation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Goldman Sachs and the Wall Street Conman by Manish Mishra</title>
		<link>http://blog.tbli.org/?p=235&#038;cpage=1#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Manish Mishra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tbli.org/?p=235#comment-402</guid>
		<description>While not defending any of the companies mentioned or GS; Dow, Shell, etc. are still amongst the leaders in their respective segments. It is not that GS is doing something that its peers do not, it is just that they are doing it better!
It is not a fair world Robert, am afraid...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While not defending any of the companies mentioned or GS; Dow, Shell, etc. are still amongst the leaders in their respective segments. It is not that GS is doing something that its peers do not, it is just that they are doing it better!<br />
It is not a fair world Robert, am afraid&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Goldman Sachs and the Wall Street Conman by Dean Warner</title>
		<link>http://blog.tbli.org/?p=235&#038;cpage=1#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Warner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 06:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tbli.org/?p=235#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Dear Robert,
GS may have aided and abetted Greece by providing the financial instrument (a swap) to enable them to &#039;adjust&#039; their cash flows, but Greece was the guilty party in reporting this as reduced debt. GS were simply displaying business opportunism (although I&#039;m certainly not defending them).
And by the way - how can a widely-reported swap (Risk magazine mentioned it as far back as 2003) suddenly come as a surprise to EU officials??
This is however more a question of how the entire EU budget and accounts network has become completely corrupt. The EU&#039;s own auditors have rejected the official annual reports in every year for more than a decade now.
Have a look at some of the reports and articles written by Marta Andreassen (I think that&#039;s the spelling) who became a corruption whistle-blower within the EU finance team - she&#039;s now an MEP for UKIP (who favour the UK&#039;s withdrawal from the EU).
Terrifying but fascinating stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Robert,<br />
GS may have aided and abetted Greece by providing the financial instrument (a swap) to enable them to &#8216;adjust&#8217; their cash flows, but Greece was the guilty party in reporting this as reduced debt. GS were simply displaying business opportunism (although I&#8217;m certainly not defending them).<br />
And by the way &#8211; how can a widely-reported swap (Risk magazine mentioned it as far back as 2003) suddenly come as a surprise to EU officials??<br />
This is however more a question of how the entire EU budget and accounts network has become completely corrupt. The EU&#8217;s own auditors have rejected the official annual reports in every year for more than a decade now.<br />
Have a look at some of the reports and articles written by Marta Andreassen (I think that&#8217;s the spelling) who became a corruption whistle-blower within the EU finance team &#8211; she&#8217;s now an MEP for UKIP (who favour the UK&#8217;s withdrawal from the EU).<br />
Terrifying but fascinating stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Doing God&#8217;s work or destroying my company by Tegenlicht - Waar is de woede? , Archive &#187; the real world: Spijt</title>
		<link>http://blog.tbli.org/?p=199&#038;cpage=1#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Tegenlicht - Waar is de woede? , Archive &#187; the real world: Spijt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tbli.org/?p=199#comment-275</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;In a recent interview in the Financial Times, Lloyd Blankfein: chairman and CEO, said “I am doing Gods work”. This is by far the funniest line I have heard in a long time. In fact, nearly all my relations in the financial sector fell off their chair laughing. After, regaining consciousness from laughter, I started to think more carefully about Goldman and the other mega banks that survived directly and indirectly via taxpayer bailout.&#8221;  Schreef Robert Rubinstein in een reactie op deze site. Lees het hele stukje op dit weblog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;In a recent interview in the Financial Times, Lloyd Blankfein: chairman and CEO, said “I am doing Gods work”. This is by far the funniest line I have heard in a long time. In fact, nearly all my relations in the financial sector fell off their chair laughing. After, regaining consciousness from laughter, I started to think more carefully about Goldman and the other mega banks that survived directly and indirectly via taxpayer bailout.&#8221;  Schreef Robert Rubinstein in een reactie op deze site. Lees het hele stukje op dit weblog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Green Investment Impulse by Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.tbli.org/?p=153&#038;cpage=1#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tbli.org/?p=153#comment-165</guid>
		<description>By this logic we should just keep doing as we&#039;ve been doing for the last 100 years. I for one don&#039;t want to. I&#039;d rather seek solutions to live well but not destroy the world around me in order to have a good life.  And if it means I cant be AS comfortable as they were in the 80&#039;s or 90&#039;s, so be it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By this logic we should just keep doing as we&#8217;ve been doing for the last 100 years. I for one don&#8217;t want to. I&#8217;d rather seek solutions to live well but not destroy the world around me in order to have a good life.  And if it means I cant be AS comfortable as they were in the 80&#8242;s or 90&#8242;s, so be it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Green Investment Impulse by David Umlauf</title>
		<link>http://blog.tbli.org/?p=153&#038;cpage=1#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>David Umlauf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 23:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tbli.org/?p=153#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Keep in mind that Roosevelt&#039;s treasury secretary said, in 1939, &quot;we spent all of this money and we didn&#039;t accomplish anything.&quot;  

I&#039;m afraid that this is the fate of a large portion of the &quot;green revolution&quot;  You can underwrite all of the bonds, then you can package them and retranche them, and then retranche them again, and then sell them to investors and hedge funds and to institutional funds.  But, if the underlying assets are of questionable economic value, then well, think sub-prime mortgages.

Just because a bunch of crap can be underwritten, doesn&#039;t make it economically viable.  Windmills, solar panels, ethanol, biomass and the like are not yet economically viable.  If they were, the would not need any government &quot;stimulus.&quot;  If they were economically viable, they could compete with no government subsidy.  As of yet, they cannot.  It still costs about 6+c/kw hr. to produce electricity with a windmill.  A coal fired generator costs only about 4c/kw hr.  this 50% difference in cost has been made up only by significant government subsidy.  

We have also discovered that the turbines seem to fail at a frighteningly high rate, such that they are out of production when we need them.  

No one in this administration has even said the first word about atomic fired power plants, which when built and when we account for decommissioning and storing spent fuel rods produce electricity at about 3c/kw hr and have no emissions.  Why subsidize loser technologies when cheap, winning technologies are readily available?  

Ethanol is another renewable scam, taking more actual energy to produce than the end product gives off.  Plus, it takes roughly 4 gallons of water to produce 1 gallon of ethanol.  In places where corn is grown in abundance, water is a big issue and most states with water issues don&#039;t wish to waste their precious resource on another losing technology.

Supporting GM&#039;s Volt project....well this is another bit of inanity.  Plugging in a car is a great idea.  Yet, remember all of the electricity that we need to produce to generate enough juice to repower the batteries?  Where will it come from?  Perhaps all of the subsidized windmills and solar panels.  Well, here&#039;s a newsflash.  Americans don&#039;t want to overpay for a technologically advanced car that doesn&#039;t give them the amenities that they want.....size safety, comfort and convenience.  If they want a spartan car whose principal benefit is good mileage, well they&#039;ll buy a vehicle from a company that understands and takes seriously the business of making such cars:  (honda, toyota, hyundai, nissan)  Every attempt at making such cars by the US producers has resulted in losses for those producers.  In this case, losses for the taxpayers, since we as citizens effectively own GM.  I think that President Obama will have a great deal of credibility on this issue when HE himself uses one for the presidential limo.

Additionally, the President decided to have a Pizza party (a good thing for him to have) and ordered Pizzas from a restaurant in .......St. Louis.  If we have a shortage of oil, the president needs to show it by not wasting that oil on pizza orders from 1/2 way across the country.  I&#039;ve been to DC and there are many fine Pizza places there where the president could have ordered from.  

The &quot;green new deal&quot;  is basically a sham. Investments in companies and bonds will only end up breaking your heart.
Buy soap companies, food producers, and pharmaceutical companies.  You&#039;ll likely be much happier with your investments.

Best Wishes

David Umlauf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind that Roosevelt&#8217;s treasury secretary said, in 1939, &#8220;we spent all of this money and we didn&#8217;t accomplish anything.&#8221;  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid that this is the fate of a large portion of the &#8220;green revolution&#8221;  You can underwrite all of the bonds, then you can package them and retranche them, and then retranche them again, and then sell them to investors and hedge funds and to institutional funds.  But, if the underlying assets are of questionable economic value, then well, think sub-prime mortgages.</p>
<p>Just because a bunch of crap can be underwritten, doesn&#8217;t make it economically viable.  Windmills, solar panels, ethanol, biomass and the like are not yet economically viable.  If they were, the would not need any government &#8220;stimulus.&#8221;  If they were economically viable, they could compete with no government subsidy.  As of yet, they cannot.  It still costs about 6+c/kw hr. to produce electricity with a windmill.  A coal fired generator costs only about 4c/kw hr.  this 50% difference in cost has been made up only by significant government subsidy.  </p>
<p>We have also discovered that the turbines seem to fail at a frighteningly high rate, such that they are out of production when we need them.  </p>
<p>No one in this administration has even said the first word about atomic fired power plants, which when built and when we account for decommissioning and storing spent fuel rods produce electricity at about 3c/kw hr and have no emissions.  Why subsidize loser technologies when cheap, winning technologies are readily available?  </p>
<p>Ethanol is another renewable scam, taking more actual energy to produce than the end product gives off.  Plus, it takes roughly 4 gallons of water to produce 1 gallon of ethanol.  In places where corn is grown in abundance, water is a big issue and most states with water issues don&#8217;t wish to waste their precious resource on another losing technology.</p>
<p>Supporting GM&#8217;s Volt project&#8230;.well this is another bit of inanity.  Plugging in a car is a great idea.  Yet, remember all of the electricity that we need to produce to generate enough juice to repower the batteries?  Where will it come from?  Perhaps all of the subsidized windmills and solar panels.  Well, here&#8217;s a newsflash.  Americans don&#8217;t want to overpay for a technologically advanced car that doesn&#8217;t give them the amenities that they want&#8230;..size safety, comfort and convenience.  If they want a spartan car whose principal benefit is good mileage, well they&#8217;ll buy a vehicle from a company that understands and takes seriously the business of making such cars:  (honda, toyota, hyundai, nissan)  Every attempt at making such cars by the US producers has resulted in losses for those producers.  In this case, losses for the taxpayers, since we as citizens effectively own GM.  I think that President Obama will have a great deal of credibility on this issue when HE himself uses one for the presidential limo.</p>
<p>Additionally, the President decided to have a Pizza party (a good thing for him to have) and ordered Pizzas from a restaurant in &#8230;&#8230;.St. Louis.  If we have a shortage of oil, the president needs to show it by not wasting that oil on pizza orders from 1/2 way across the country.  I&#8217;ve been to DC and there are many fine Pizza places there where the president could have ordered from.  </p>
<p>The &#8220;green new deal&#8221;  is basically a sham. Investments in companies and bonds will only end up breaking your heart.<br />
Buy soap companies, food producers, and pharmaceutical companies.  You&#8217;ll likely be much happier with your investments.</p>
<p>Best Wishes</p>
<p>David Umlauf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Green Investment Impulse by Allen Taylor</title>
		<link>http://blog.tbli.org/?p=153&#038;cpage=1#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tbli.org/?p=153#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Nice writing.  You are on my RSS reader now so I can read more from you down the road.

Allen Taylor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice writing.  You are on my RSS reader now so I can read more from you down the road.</p>
<p>Allen Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Renewable Plastic by Kurt</title>
		<link>http://blog.tbli.org/?p=87&#038;cpage=1#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbli.org/blog/?p=87#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Cereplast is also a company to look at for investors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cereplast is also a company to look at for investors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Writer on the Blog by Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.tbli.org/?p=75&#038;cpage=1#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbli.org/blog/?p=75#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Why thank you Max. I shall do my best and Im glad to have you out there as a reader and as a source!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why thank you Max. I shall do my best and Im glad to have you out there as a reader and as a source!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
